DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford S-Max vs 2016 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMazda
S-MaxModelCX-5
2016Model year2016
MPVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,1 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
196 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower165 HP
350 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank56 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4796 mmLength4555 mm
1916 mmWidth1840 mm
1953 mmHeight1710 mm
1784 KgWeight1315 Kg
2849 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford S-Max and 2016 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…