DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Ford S-Max vs 2006 Suzuki Forenza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Forenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

51.25–52
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeSuzuki
S-MaxModelForenza
2011Model year2006
MPVBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
205 km/hTop speed175 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
163 HPPower120 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4903 mmLength4500 mm
2154 mmWidth1725 mm
1660 mmHeight1445 mm
1690 KgWeight1250 Kg
—Wheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Ford S-Max and 2006 Suzuki Forenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Forenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…