2022 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger XLT 2022 2.0 EcoBlue 170 HPOverall Score77/100
2022 Ford Ranger vs 2011 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Chevrolet
Captiva
Chevrolet Captiva 2.2 VCDi 16V (163 Hp) 2011Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 8.5 points.
77–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationChevrolet Captiva
FordMakeChevrolet
RangerModelCaptiva
2022Model year2011
Pick UpBody typeSUV
—Seats5
—Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationChevrolet Captiva
11,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
180 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2231 cc
170 HPPower163 HP
420 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationChevrolet Captiva
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationChevrolet Captiva
4x2DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationChevrolet Captiva
5359 mmLength4673 mm
1977 mmWidth1868-1849 mm
1821 mmHeight1756 mm
2068 kgWeight1778 Kg
- ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2707 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2022 Ford Ranger and 2011 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 8.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…