2003 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 4.0 V6 (207 Hp) 2003Overall Score70.75/100
2003 Ford Ranger vs 2003 Chevrolet Astro Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Chevrolet
Astro
Chevrolet Astro 4.3 i V6 (192 Hp) 2003Overall Score71.5/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Astro
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationChevrolet Astro
FordMakeChevrolet
RangerModelAstro
2003Model year2003
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
4Seats8
2Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationChevrolet Astro
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
4014 ccEngine displacement4300 cc
207 HPPower192 HP
323 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationChevrolet Astro
PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank102 lt
—Urban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationChevrolet Astro
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationChevrolet Astro
4763 mmLength4821 mm
1763 mmWidth1969 mm
1648 mmHeight1903 mm
1399 KgWeight2025 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2825 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford Ranger and 2003 Chevrolet Astro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Astro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…