2003 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 4.0 V6 (207 Hp) 2003Overall Score70.75/100
2003 Ford Ranger vs 2005 Ford Mustang Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.0 i V6 12V (212 Hp) 2005Overall Score71.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Mustang
FordMakeFord
RangerModelMustang
2003Model year2005
Pick-upBody typeCabriolet
4Seats4
2Doors2
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Mustang
—0–100 km/h7,0 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4014 ccEngine displacement4009 cc
207 HPPower212 HP
323 NmTorque325 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Mustang
PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Mustang
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Mustang
4763 mmLength4765 mm
1763 mmWidth1877 mm
1648 mmHeight1415 mm
1399 KgWeight1625 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2720 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford Ranger and 2005 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…