E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Ranger vs 2005 Ford F-150 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford F-150

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford RangerSpecificationFord F-150
FordMakeFord
RangerModelF-150
2003Model year2005
Pick-upBody type—
4Seats—
2Doors—

Performance

Ford RangerSpecificationFord F-150
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4014 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
207 HPPower202 HP
323 NmTorque206 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Ford RangerSpecificationFord F-150
PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford RangerSpecificationFord F-150
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
235/75 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Ford RangerSpecificationFord F-150
4763 mmLength—
1763 mmWidth—
1648 mmHeight—
1399 KgWeight—
2835 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Ranger and 2005 Ford F-150 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford F-150 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2003 Chevrolet AstroVS2003 Ford RangerChevrolet Astro vs Ford Ranger2003 and 2003 model years2003 Ford ExplorerVS2003 Ford RangerFord Explorer vs Ford Ranger2003 and 2003 model years2005 Ford MustangVS2003 Ford RangerFord Mustang vs Ford Ranger2005 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVS2003 Ford RangerFord F-150 vs Ford Ranger2005 and 2003 model years2005 Pontiac BonnevilleVS2003 Ford RangerPontiac Bonneville vs Ford Ranger2005 and 2003 model years

Comments are loading…