DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Ford Ranger vs 2019 Mitsubishi L200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
RESULT

Tie

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.

71.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMitsubishi
RangerModelL200
2014Model year2019
Pick-upBody typePick Up
5Seats—
4Doors—

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h16,6 s
175 km/hTop speed177 km/h
3198 ccEngine displacement2442 cc
200 HPPower181 HP
470 NmTorque430 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
12,0 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—TransmissionAutomatic
255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5359 mmLength5285 mm
1850 mmWidth1815 mm
1815 mmHeight1780 mm
2073 KgWeight1950 kg
—Luggage capacity1070 lt
3220 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Ford Ranger

No additional feature records are available.

Mitsubishi L200Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Ford Ranger and 2019 Mitsubishi L200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…