DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Ford Ranger vs 2011 Mitsubishi Pajero Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Pajero

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–72.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMitsubishi
RangerModelPajero
2011Model year2011
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed177 km/h
3198 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
200 HPPower178 HP
470 NmTorque261 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank88 lt
12,0 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size265/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5359 mmLength4900 mm
1850 mmWidth1875 mm
1815 mmHeight1870 mm
2073 KgWeight2310 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Ford Ranger and 2011 Mitsubishi Pajero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Pajero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…