DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Ford Ranger vs 2006 SsangYong Actyon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Actyon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

51.25–52
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeSsangYong
RangerModelActyon
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,2 s
0 km/hTop speed164 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
154 HPPower150 HP
0 NmTorque214 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption15,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,0 lt
—Average consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size225/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4763 mmLength4455 mm
1786 mmWidth1880 mm
1648 mmHeight1740 mm
1397 KgWeight1892 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2740 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Ford Ranger and 2006 SsangYong Actyon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Actyon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…