2009 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 3.0 TDCi (156 Hp) 2009Overall Score74.5/100
2009 Ford Ranger vs 2009 Dodge Charger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Dodge
Charger
Dodge Charger 2.7 (181 Hp) 2009Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationDodge Charger
FordMakeDodge
RangerModelCharger
2009Model year2009
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationDodge Charger
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2953 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
156 HPPower181 HP
380 NmTorque258 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationDodge Charger
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,0 lt
—Average consumption11,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationDodge Charger
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/70 R16Tyre size215/65 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationDodge Charger
5075 mmLength5082 mm
1805 mmWidth1891 mm
1745 mmHeight1479 mm
1802 KgWeight1695 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase3048 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Ford Ranger and 2009 Dodge Charger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…