2010 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2010Overall Score67.75/100
2010 Ford Ranger vs 2010 SsangYong Kyron Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • SsangYong
Kyron
SsangYong Kyron 2.3i 16V (150) 2010Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
SsangYong Kyron
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationSsangYong Kyron
FordMakeSsangYong
RangerModelKyron
2010Model year2010
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationSsangYong Kyron
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2299 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
330 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationSsangYong Kyron
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationSsangYong Kyron
5075 mmLength4660 mm
1805 mmWidth1880 mm
1745 mmHeight1755 mm
3000 mmWheelbase2740 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Ford Ranger and 2010 SsangYong Kyron approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, SsangYong Kyron leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…