2010 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2010Overall Score67.75/100
2010 Ford Ranger vs 2006 Mazda B-series Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Mazda
B-series
Mazda B-series 2.5 TD 4WD (109 Hp) 2006Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2.25 points.
67.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda B-series
FordMakeMazda
RangerModelB-series
2010Model year2006
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda B-series
0 km/hTop speed130 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
143 HPPower109 HP
330 NmTorque266 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda B-series
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda B-series
5075 mmLength5020 mm
1805 mmWidth1695 mm
1745 mmHeight1740 mm
—Weight1205 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2835 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Ford Ranger and 2006 Mazda B-series approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…