2008 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2008Overall Score67.75/100
2008 Ford Ranger vs 2007 Caterham CSR Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2007 • Caterham
CSR
Caterham CSR 2007Overall Score77.5/100
WINNER
Caterham CSR
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 9.75 points.
67.75–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationCaterham CSR
FordMakeCaterham
RangerModelCSR
2008Model year2007
Pick-upBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationCaterham CSR
—0–100 km/h3,7 s
0 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
143 HPPower200 HP
330 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationCaterham CSR
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Urban consumption16,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,5 lt
—Average consumption11,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationCaterham CSR
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size195/45R15; 255/40 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationCaterham CSR
5075 mmLength3300 mm
1805 mmWidth1685 mm
1745 mmHeight1140 mm
—Weight565 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2315 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Ford Ranger and 2007 Caterham CSR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 9.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…