DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Ford Ranger vs 2008 Nissan Frontier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Frontier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
RangerModelFrontier
2008Model year2008
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
143 HPPower154 HP
330 NmTorque231 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size235/75 R15; 265/70 R16; 265/75 R16; 265/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5075 mmLength5220 mm
1805 mmWidth1850 mm
1745 mmHeight1879 mm
3000 mmWheelbase3200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Ford Ranger and 2008 Nissan Frontier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Frontier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…