2008 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2008Overall Score67.75/100
2008 Ford Ranger vs 2008 Mazda Tribute Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Mazda
Tribute
Mazda Tribute 2.5i (171 Hp) 2008Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Tribute
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda Tribute
FordMakeMazda
RangerModelTribute
2008Model year2008
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda Tribute
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
143 HPPower171 HP
330 NmTorque232 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda Tribute
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption10,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda Tribute
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda Tribute
5075 mmLength4442 mm
1805 mmWidth—
1745 mmHeight1783 mm
—Weight1484 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2619 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Ford Ranger and 2008 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…