2006 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (109 Hp) 2006Overall Score65.5/100
2006 Ford Ranger vs 2006 Nissan Navara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Nissan
Navara
Nissan Navara 2.5 dCi Double Cab (174 Hp) 2006Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Navara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.
65.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Navara
FordMakeNissan
RangerModelNavara
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Navara
—0–100 km/h11,4 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
109 HPPower174 HP
266 NmTorque403 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Navara
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption8,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Navara
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
235/75 R15Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Navara
5020 mmLength5220 mm
1695 mmWidth1850 mm
1750 mmHeight1774 mm
1399 KgWeight2050 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase3200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Ford Ranger and 2006 Nissan Navara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Navara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…