DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Ford Ranger vs 2006 Citroen C5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeCitroen
RangerModelC5
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
109 HPPower136 HP
266 NmTorque322 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption8,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,0 lt
—Average consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size205/65 R15; 215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5020 mmLength4756 mm
1695 mmWidth1770 mm
1750 mmHeight1516 mm
1399 KgWeight1518 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Ford Ranger and 2006 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…