DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Ranger vs 2004 Citroen C5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeCitroen
RangerModelC5
2004Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,6 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
109 HPPower133 HP
266 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Urban consumption9,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5020 mmLength4839 mm
1695 mmWidth1780 mm
1750 mmHeight1511 mm
1399 KgWeight1591 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Ranger and 2004 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…