2017 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (160 Hp) 2017Overall Score76.5/100
2017 Ford Ranger vs 2017 Nissan Navara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Nissan
Navara
Nissan Navara Tekna 2017 2.3 dCi 160 HPOverall Score75.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
76.5–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Navara
FordMakeNissan
RangerModelNavara
2017Model year2017
Pick-upBody typePick Up
5Seats—
4Doors—
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Navara
—0–100 km/h12,0 s
175 km/hTop speed172 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2298 cc
160 HPPower160 HP
385 NmTorque403 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Navara
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption7,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Navara
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—TransmissionManual
215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Navara
5362 mmLength5300 mm
1860 mmWidth1850 mm
1815 mmHeight1790 mm
1883 KgWeight1993 kg
—Luggage capacity? lt
3220 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Ford Ranger and 2017 Nissan Navara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…