2017 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (160 Hp) 2017Overall Score76.5/100
2017 Ford Ranger vs 2019 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2019 • Mitsubishi
L 200
Mitsubishi L 200 2.4 MIVEC (181 Hp) 2019Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
FordMakeMitsubishi
RangerModelL 200
2017Model year2019
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2442 cc
160 HPPower181 HP
385 NmTorque430 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size245/70 R16; 245/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
5362 mmLength5290 mm
1860 mmWidth1815 mm
1815 mmHeight1795-1780 mm
1883 KgWeight—
3220 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Ford Ranger and 2019 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…