2017 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (160 Hp) 2017Overall Score76.5/100
2017 Ford Ranger vs 2017 Mazda 6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.2 SKYACTIV-D (175 Hp) 2017Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 6
FordMakeMazda
RangerModel6
2017Model year2017
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 6
—0–100 km/h7,9 s
175 km/hTop speed223 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2191 cc
160 HPPower175 HP
385 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 6
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption5,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 6
5362 mmLength4870 mm
1860 mmWidth1840 mm
1815 mmHeight1450 mm
1883 KgWeight1485-1590 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2830 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Ford Ranger and 2017 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…