2016 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (160 Hp) 2016Overall Score76.5/100
2016 Ford Ranger vs 2016 Volkswagen Amarok Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Volkswagen
Amarok
Volkswagen Amarok 2.0 TDI (180 Hp) 2016Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 6 points.
76.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationVolkswagen Amarok
FordMakeVolkswagen
RangerModelAmarok
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationVolkswagen Amarok
—0–100 km/h10,3-10.7 s
175 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
160 HPPower180 HP
385 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationVolkswagen Amarok
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption8,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationVolkswagen Amarok
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationVolkswagen Amarok
5362 mmLength5254 mm
1860 mmWidth1944 mm
1815 mmHeight1834 mm
1883 KgWeight1905 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase3095 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Ranger and 2016 Volkswagen Amarok approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 6 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…