2016 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (160 Hp) 2016Overall Score76.5/100
2016 Ford Ranger vs 2016 Mitsubishi Triton Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Mitsubishi
Triton
Mitsubishi Triton 2.5 DI-D (178 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
FordMakeMitsubishi
RangerModelTriton
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
160 HPPower178 HP
385 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
5362 mmLength5280 mm
1860 mmWidth1815 mm
1815 mmHeight1780 mm
1883 KgWeight1835 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Ranger and 2016 Mitsubishi Triton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…