2016 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (160 Hp) 2016Overall Score76.5/100
2016 Ford Ranger vs 2019 Mitsubishi L200 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2019 • Mitsubishi
L200
Mitsubishi L200 Blizzard 2019 2.4 181 HPOverall Score71.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5 points.
76.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L200
FordMakeMitsubishi
RangerModelL200
2016Model year2019
Pick-upBody typePick Up
5Seats—
4Doors—
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L200
—0–100 km/h16,6 s
175 km/hTop speed177 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2442 cc
160 HPPower181 HP
385 NmTorque430 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L200
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption8,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L200
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—TransmissionAutomatic
215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L200
5362 mmLength5285 mm
1860 mmWidth1815 mm
1815 mmHeight1780 mm
1883 KgWeight1950 kg
—Luggage capacity1070 lt
3220 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Ranger and 2019 Mitsubishi L200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…