2016 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (160 Hp) 2016Overall Score76.5/100
2016 Ford Ranger vs 2016 Mazda MX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Mazda
MX-5
Mazda MX-5 Power Sense 2016 2.0 160 HPOverall Score75.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
76.5–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda MX-5
FordMakeMazda
RangerModelMX-5
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeCabrio
5Seats—
4Doors—
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda MX-5
—0–100 km/h7,3 s
175 km/hTop speed214 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
160 HPPower160 HP
385 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda MX-5
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption8,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda MX-5
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—TransmissionManual
215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda MX-5
5362 mmLength3915 mm
1860 mmWidth1735 mm
1815 mmHeight1225 mm
1883 KgWeight1090 kg
—Luggage capacity130 lt
3220 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Ranger and 2016 Mazda MX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…