DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Ford Ranger vs 2012 SsangYong Chairman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Chairman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeSsangYong
RangerModelChairman
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
175 km/hTop speed197 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2295 cc
125 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption15,3 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5359 mmLength5055 mm
1850 mmWidth1825 mm
1815 mmHeight1465 mm
2048 KgWeight1700 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Ford Ranger and 2012 SsangYong Chairman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Chairman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…