2000 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.7 16V (125 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.5/100
2000 Ford Puma vs 2000 Audi Cabriolet Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Audi
Cabriolet
Audi Cabriolet 1.8 20V (125 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford PumaSpecificationAudi Cabriolet
FordMakeAudi
PumaModelCabriolet
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
2+2Seats4
3Doors2
Performance
Ford PumaSpecificationAudi Cabriolet
9,2 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
203 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1679 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
125 HPPower125 HP
157 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford PumaSpecificationAudi Cabriolet
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford PumaSpecificationAudi Cabriolet
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford PumaSpecificationAudi Cabriolet
3984 mmLength4366 mm
1674 mmWidth1716 mm
1345 mmHeight1379 mm
1040 KgWeight1370 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2556 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Puma and 2000 Audi Cabriolet approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…