2000 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.7 16V (125 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.5/100
2000 Ford Puma vs 2000 Mercedes-Benz C Serisi Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mercedes-Benz
C Serisi
Mercedes-Benz C Serisi 202.018) 2000Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford PumaSpecificationMercedes-Benz C Serisi
FordMakeMercedes-Benz
PumaModelC Serisi
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Ford PumaSpecificationMercedes-Benz C Serisi
9,2 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
203 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1679 ccEngine displacement1799 cc
125 HPPower122 HP
157 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford PumaSpecificationMercedes-Benz C Serisi
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption12,7 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford PumaSpecificationMercedes-Benz C Serisi
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford PumaSpecificationMercedes-Benz C Serisi
3984 mmLength4487 mm
1674 mmWidth1720 mm
1345 mmHeight1414 mm
1040 KgWeight1350 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2690 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Puma and 2000 Mercedes-Benz C Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…