DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Puma vs 2000 Audi A4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Puma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford PumaSpecificationAudi A4
FordMakeAudi
PumaModelA4
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeEstate
2+2Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Ford PumaSpecificationAudi A4
9,2 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
203 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1679 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
125 HPPower125 HP
157 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford PumaSpecificationAudi A4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford PumaSpecificationAudi A4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford PumaSpecificationAudi A4
3984 mmLength4479 mm
1674 mmWidth1733 mm
1345 mmHeight1417 mm
1040 KgWeight1390 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2607 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Puma and 2000 Audi A4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…