DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Ford Puma vs 1997 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Puma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford PumaSpecificationBMW Z3
FordMakeBMW
PumaModelZ3
1997Model year1997
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
2+2Seats2
3Doors2

Performance

Ford PumaSpecificationBMW Z3
9,2 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
203 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1679 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
125 HPPower115 HP
157 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford PumaSpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank51 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Ford PumaSpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford PumaSpecificationBMW Z3
3984 mmLength4025 mm
1674 mmWidth1692 mm
1345 mmHeight1288 mm
1040 KgWeight1160 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Ford Puma and 1997 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…