2002 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.6 i 16V (103 Hp) 2002Overall Score51.25/100
2002 Ford Puma vs 2002 Mitsubishi Space Star Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Mitsubishi
Space Star
Mitsubishi Space Star 1.6 (98 Hp) 2002Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford PumaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Star
FordMakeMitsubishi
PumaModelSpace Star
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeMinivan
2+2Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Ford PumaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Star
10,4 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
190 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
103 HPPower98 HP
145 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford PumaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Star
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford PumaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Star
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford PumaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Star
3984 mmLength4030 mm
1674 mmWidth1715 mm
1345 mmHeight1515 mm
1035 KgWeight1235 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Puma and 2002 Mitsubishi Space Star approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…