DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Ford Puma vs 2002 Hyundai Getz Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Puma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeHyundai
PumaModelGetz
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
190 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1493 cc
103 HPPower82 HP
145 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption4 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3984 mmLength3810 mm
1674 mmWidth1665 mm
1345 mmHeight1490 mm
1035 KgWeight1050 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2455 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Ford Puma and 2002 Hyundai Getz approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…