2002 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.6 i 16V (103 Hp) 2002Overall Score51.25/100
2002 Ford Puma vs 2002 Citroen Xsara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.8 i (101 Hp) 2002Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford PumaSpecificationCitroen Xsara
FordMakeCitroen
PumaModelXsara
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeEstate
2+2Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Ford PumaSpecificationCitroen Xsara
10,4 s0–100 km/h15,8 s
190 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
103 HPPower101 HP
145 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford PumaSpecificationCitroen Xsara
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank54 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford PumaSpecificationCitroen Xsara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/50 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford PumaSpecificationCitroen Xsara
3984 mmLength4167 mm
1674 mmWidth1698 mm
1345 mmHeight1405 mm
1035 KgWeight1070 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Puma and 2002 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…