2002 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.4 16V (90 Hp) 2002Overall Score47.25/100
2002 Ford Puma vs 2002 Ford Fusion Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Fusion
Ford Fusion 1.4 TDCi (68 Hp) 2002Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford PumaSpecificationFord Fusion
FordMakeFord
PumaModelFusion
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Ford PumaSpecificationFord Fusion
11,9 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
180 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1388 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
90 HPPower68 HP
125 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford PumaSpecificationFord Fusion
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford PumaSpecificationFord Fusion
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford PumaSpecificationFord Fusion
3984 mmLength4020 mm
1674 mmWidth1708 mm
1345 mmHeight1503 mm
1035 KgWeight1105 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2488 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Puma and 2002 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…