1998 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.4 16V (90 Hp) 1998Overall Score46.25/100
1998 Ford Puma vs 2000 Ford Fiesta Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Fiesta
Ford Fiesta 1.4 i 16V (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Ford Fiesta
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford PumaSpecificationFord Fiesta
FordMakeFord
PumaModelFiesta
1998Model year2000
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Ford PumaSpecificationFord Fiesta
11,9 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
180 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1388 ccEngine displacement1388 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
125 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford PumaSpecificationFord Fiesta
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank42 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford PumaSpecificationFord Fiesta
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size185/55 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford PumaSpecificationFord Fiesta
3984 mmLength3828 mm
1674 mmWidth1634 mm
1345 mmHeight1320 mm
1035 KgWeight950 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2446 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Ford Puma and 2000 Ford Fiesta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Fiesta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…