1996 • Ford
Probe
Ford Probe 2.0 16V (117 Hp) 1996Overall Score48/100
1996 Ford Probe vs 1997 Ford Probe Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Ford
Probe
Ford Probe 2.5 V6 24V (165 Hp) 1997Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Ford Probe
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
48–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford ProbeSpecificationFord Probe
FordMakeFord
ProbeModelProbe
1996Model year1997
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors2
Performance
Ford ProbeSpecificationFord Probe
—0–100 km/h8,0 s
190 km/hTop speed220 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
117 HPPower165 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm
—Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford ProbeSpecificationFord Probe
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,6 lt
—Average consumption9,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford ProbeSpecificationFord Probe
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford ProbeSpecificationFord Probe
4544 mmLength4544 mm
1773 mmWidth1773 mm
1310 mmHeight1310 mm
1188 KgWeight1226 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Ford Probe and 1997 Ford Probe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Probe leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…