E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Ford Mustang vs 2016 Audi RS 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi RS 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 14.75 points.

83.75–98.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford MustangSpecificationAudi RS 6
FordMakeAudi
MustangModelRS 6
2015Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Ford MustangSpecificationAudi RS 6
—0–100 km/h3,9 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4951 ccEngine displacement3993 cc
421 HPPower560 HP
530 NmTorque700 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Ford MustangSpecificationAudi RS 6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption13,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
13,6 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford MustangSpecificationAudi RS 6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8 Tiptronic
255/40 R19; 275/40 R19Tyre size275/35 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford MustangSpecificationAudi RS 6
4784 mmLength4979 mm
1916 mmWidth1936 mm
1394 mmHeight1461-1482 mm
1786 KgWeight1935 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2915 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Ford Mustang and 2016 Audi RS 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi RS 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 14.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2013 Land Rover DiscoveryVS2015 Ford MustangLand Rover Discovery vs Ford Mustang2013 and 2015 model years

Comments are loading…