1992 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.9 V8 (228 Hp) 1992Overall Score78.75/100
1992 Ford Mustang vs 1996 Lincoln Mark Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Lincoln
Mark
Lincoln Mark 4.6 i V8 32V LSC (290 Hp) 1996Overall Score77.75/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MustangSpecificationLincoln Mark
FordMakeLincoln
MustangModelMark
1992Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2+2Seats5
2Doors2
Performance
Ford MustangSpecificationLincoln Mark
220 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
228 HPPower290 HP
407 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MustangSpecificationLincoln Mark
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank68 lt
20 ltUrban consumption—
12 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MustangSpecificationLincoln Mark
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/55 ZR16Tyre size225/60 R16 V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MustangSpecificationLincoln Mark
4560 mmLength5265 mm
1735 mmWidth1900 mm
1320 mmHeight1361 mm
1380 KgWeight1715 Kg
2555 mmWheelbase2870 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Ford Mustang and 1996 Lincoln Mark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…