1992 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.9 V8 (228 Hp) 1992Overall Score78.75/100
1992 Ford Mustang vs 1997 Holden UTE Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 5.0 i V8 32V VR-6 (265 Hp) 1997Overall Score77.75/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MustangSpecificationHolden UTE
FordMakeHolden
MustangModelUTE
1992Model year1997
CabrioletBody typePick-up
2+2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Ford MustangSpecificationHolden UTE
220 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
228 HPPower265 HP
407 NmTorque430 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MustangSpecificationHolden UTE
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank80 lt
20 ltUrban consumption—
12 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MustangSpecificationHolden UTE
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/55 ZR16Tyre size225/60 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford MustangSpecificationHolden UTE
4560 mmLength4861 mm
1735 mmWidth1794 mm
1320 mmHeight1450 mm
1380 KgWeight1450 Kg
2555 mmWheelbase2731 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Ford Mustang and 1997 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…