DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Ford Mustang vs 2004 Cadillac XLR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

87.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeCadillac
MustangModelXLR
2005Model year2004
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,9 s
240 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4606 ccEngine displacement4565 cc
304 HPPower325 HP
427 NmTorque420 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank68 lt
17 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
13,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
15,5 ltAverage consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/55 R17Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4513 mm
1875 mmWidth1836 mm
1385 mmHeight1279 mm
1565 KgWeight1690 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2685 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Ford Mustang and 2004 Cadillac XLR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…