DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Artega GT vs 1993 Bugatti EB 112 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Bugatti EB 112

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 4 points.

88.5–92.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ArtegaMakeBugatti
GTModelEB 112
2010Model year1993
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats4
2Doors4

Performance

4,8 s0–100 km/h4,7 s
270 km/hTop speed300 km/h
3597 ccEngine displacement5995 cc
300 HPPower461 HP
350 NmTorque590 Nm
6Cylinders12

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank120 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption25 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption12 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 DSGGears6
235/35 R19; 285/30 R19Tyre size255/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4015 mmLength5070 mm
1882 mmWidth1960 mm
1180 mmHeight1405 mm
1285 KgWeight1700 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase3100 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Artega GT and 1993 Bugatti EB 112 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Bugatti EB 112 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 4 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…