DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Artega GT vs 2000 Chrysler Stratus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Artega GT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 26 points.

88.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ArtegaMakeChrysler
GTModelStratus
2010Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

4,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
270 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3597 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
300 HPPower163 HP
350 NmTorque218 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption15,1 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 DSGGears4
235/35 R19; 285/30 R19Tyre size185//65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4015 mmLength4746 mm
1882 mmWidth1822 mm
1180 mmHeight1374 mm
1285 KgWeight1431 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2747 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Artega GT and 2000 Chrysler Stratus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Artega GT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 26 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…