DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Mustang vs 2003 Chevrolet Astro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Astro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeChevrolet
MustangModelAstro
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
2+2Seats8
2Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4300 cc
228 HPPower192 HP
393 NmTorque339 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank102 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/45 R17Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4821 mm
1820 mmWidth1969 mm
1360 mmHeight1903 mm
1550 KgWeight2025 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Mustang and 2003 Chevrolet Astro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Astro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…