2000 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.6 V8 GT (228 Hp) 2000Overall Score70.75/100
2000 Ford Mustang vs 1996 Lexus LX Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Lexus
LX
Lexus LX 1996Overall Score69.75/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MustangSpecificationLexus LX
FordMakeLexus
MustangModelLX
2000Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeSUV
2+2Seats7
2Doors5
Performance
Ford MustangSpecificationLexus LX
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4477 cc
228 HPPower215 HP
393 NmTorque343 Nm
8Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MustangSpecificationLexus LX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank95 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MustangSpecificationLexus LX
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
245/45 R17Tyre size275/70 R16 114H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MustangSpecificationLexus LX
4635 mmLength4820 mm
1820 mmWidth1930 mm
1360 mmHeight1870 mm
1550 KgWeight2255 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Mustang and 1996 Lexus LX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSFord Econoline vs Ford Mustang1999 and 2000 model years
VSFord Mustang vs Ford Mustang1999 and 2000 model years
VSFord Crown Victoria vs Ford Mustang1999 and 2000 model years
VSChevrolet Astro vs Ford Mustang2000 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSLexus GX vs Ford Mustang2002 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…