DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Mustang vs 1995 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
MustangModelMustang
2000Model year1995
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2+2Seats2+2
2Doors2

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
228 HPPower215 HP
393 NmTorque386 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank58 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
245/45 R17Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4610 mm
1820 mmWidth1824 mm
1360 mmHeight1356 mm
1550 KgWeight1554 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2573 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Mustang and 1995 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…