DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Mustang vs 1999 Ford Crown Victoria Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
MustangModelCrown Victoria
2000Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2+2Seats6
2Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
228 HPPower193 HP
393 NmTorque353 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption18 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/45 R17Tyre size215/70 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength5397 mm
1820 mmWidth1976 mm
1360 mmHeight1440 mm
1550 KgWeight1720 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2905 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Mustang and 1999 Ford Crown Victoria approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…