1999 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.6 V8 GT (228 Hp) 1999Overall Score69.75/100
1999 Ford Mustang vs 2002 Ford Econoline Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Econoline
Ford Econoline 4.6 i V8 XL (228 Hp) 2002Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Ford Econoline
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Econoline
FordMakeFord
MustangModelEconoline
1999Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
2+2Seats8
2Doors4
Performance
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Econoline
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
228 HPPower228 HP
393 NmTorque393 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Econoline
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank132 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Econoline
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/45 R17Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Econoline
4635 mmLength5382 mm
1820 mmWidth2014 mm
1360 mmHeight2050 mm
1550 KgWeight—
2570 mmWheelbase3505 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Ford Mustang and 2002 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Econoline leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…