DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Ford Mustang vs 2006 Honda S2000 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 10.25 points.

81.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeHonda
MustangModelS2000
2006Model year2006
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

5,3 s0–100 km/h6,2 s
230 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
304 HPPower240 HP
434 NmTorque208 Nm
8Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank50 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
—Average consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre sizeFront tyres: 215/45 R17, Rear tyres: 245/40 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4135 mm
1877 mmWidth1750 mm
1415 mmHeight1285 mm
1685 KgWeight1270 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Ford Mustang and 2006 Honda S2000 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 10.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…