2008 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.0i V6 12V (212 Hp) 2008Overall Score71.5/100
2008 Ford Mustang vs 2004 Ford Sport Trac Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Ford
Sport Trac
Ford Sport Trac 4.0 L V6 (210 HP) 2004Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Sport Trac
FordMakeFord
MustangModelSport Trac
2008Model year2004
CoupeBody type—
4Seats—
2Doors—
Performance
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Sport Trac
7,0 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4009 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
212 HPPower213 HP
325 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Sport Trac
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank0 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Sport Trac
4765 mmLength—
1875 mmWidth—
1385 mmHeight—
1530 KgWeight—
2720 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Ford Mustang and 2004 Ford Sport Trac approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSToyota Land Cruiser vs Ford Mustang2007 and 2008 model yearsImage unavailableVSChevrolet Silverado vs Ford Mustang2006 and 2008 model yearsVSFord Sport Trac vs Ford Mustang2004 and 2008 model years
VSFord Ranger vs Ford Mustang2004 and 2008 model yearsImage unavailableVSMazda B-series vs Ford Mustang2004 and 2008 model yearsComments are loading…