DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Ford Mustang vs 2005 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1.5 points.

72.25–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolvo
MustangModelV50
2005Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,9 s
180 km/hTop speed240 km/h
3813 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
190 HPPower220 HP
220 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank62 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
205/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4653 mmLength4514 mm
1857 mmWidth1770 mm
1350 mmHeight1452 mm
1455 KgWeight—
2573 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Ford Mustang and 2005 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…